Legal Opinion

In Re Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2000No. 26248PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

9 P.3d 1226 (2000)

134 Idaho 760

In the Interest of Jane DOE, a child under the age of eighteen years.

Jane Roe, Appellant,

v.

State of Idaho, Department of Health and Welfare; Jane Doe I; John Doe; and Guardian Ad Litem, Respondents.

No. 26248.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, May 2000 Term.

September 6, 2000.

Hyde, Wetherell, Bray, Haff French, Chtd., Boise, for appellant. Christopher D. Bray argued.

Hon. Alan G. Lance, Attorney General; Mary Jo Beig, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent State of Idaho. Mary Jo Beig argued.

Hummel Fletcher, Boise, for respondent John Doe. Lois K.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Stockwell v. StockwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rees v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND WELFAREIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe (In re Jane Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. John Doe (In re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS v. Zander B & Kelly B. (Foster Parents)Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. DHW v. Jane DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API