Legal Opinion

Stodghill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 2015No. 1 M.D. 2014PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER.

Before the court is a motion of Petitioner, David Stodghill, seeking judgment on the pleadings. In his pro se petition for review, and in this motion, Stodghill asks us to order the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) to consider him for parole or, otherwise, to order his release. 1 Although not so characterized by Stodghill, his claim that the Board has a statutory duty to consider him for parole is in the nature of a petition for writ of mandamus. For the reasons stated below, we deny the motion.

Stodghill is serving a sentence of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Evans v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Wilson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Casner v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Dept. of Public Welfare v. JoyceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stodghill v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Com. v. Hayward, Q.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Mayo v. SCI Greene's Administered StaffCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Stodghill v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Stodghill v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API