Legal Opinion

City of Syracuse v. Penny

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamone, J.

The City of Syracuse has moved for a preliminary injunction, pending a trial, wherein it seeks a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant Stewart Q-. Penny from performing any electrical work in the City of Syracuse, on the grounds that the said Penny has not been licensed to do this work.

In attempting to obtain a license as a limited electrician, the defendant has taken the examination provided for under the Electric Code of the City of Syracuse on three separate ■occasions, the latest being on February 6, 1969, but failed all three. The affidavits of the City of Syracuse in support of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Fink v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Matter of Lyons v. PrinceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Ru-Val Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  2. People v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York District Court · 1979
  3. USA BASEBALL v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. People v. LBR EnterprisesSuffolk County District Court · 1977
  5. Ritter v. City of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API