Legal Opinion

Brown v. MHN Gov't Servs., Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2013No. 87953-2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fl LE IN CLERKS OFFICE SUPR~ME COURT, STATE OF WASH1NG1CN DATE AUG L5 2013 lrla~9· IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BARBARA BROWN and CINDY HIETT, No. 87953-2 Respondents, En Bane v. Filed -AUG 1 5 2013 MHN GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.; HEALTH NET, INC., and MHN SERVICES d/b/a MHN SERVICES CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Appellants. J.M. JOHNSON, J.-The narrow question before us is whether an arbitration agreement signed by respondents Barbara Brown and Cindy Hiett is permeated with unconscionability and therefore unenforceable under Brown v. MHN Government Services, et…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API