In re Estate of Came

Came’s clear intent is not being carried out by the majority decision, I respectfully dissent.

*551For over one hundred years the well-settled law in New Hampshire has been that the testator’s intent should be the sovereign guide in any decision involving the interpretation of a will and the disposition of a testator’s property upon death. Brown v. Bartlett, 58 N.H. 511 (1879). Guy C. Came, and his counsel who drafted his will, had the right to rely upon this court’s repeated expression that “[t]he interpretation of the will is the ascertainment of the testator’s intention; and the question of…