Legal Opinion

State v. Hinz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1960No. File 9797, 9798PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.

The State’s Attorney of Brown County filed an -information against the defendant brothers, Elroy and Darrel D. Hinz, -charging them in separate counts with the crimes of (1) grand larceny, (2) larceny of lost property, and (3) altering, defacing, or obliterating a brand on sheep. Both defendants were found guilty of grand larceny. The jury also found Darrel guilty of altering a -brand on sheep as charged in count 3. Both defendants have appealed contending their statutory and constitutional rights were violated by police interrogation during the interim following their arrests and appearance…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Cicenia v. LagaySupreme Court of the United States · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. ThundershieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. TapioSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BeltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API