Legal Opinion

People v. MacKenzie

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1995No. H011813PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WUNDERLICH, J.

I. Statement of the Case

Defendant Alexander Scott MacKenzie appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of a “hate crime,” i.e., brandishing a firearm for the purpose of interfering with the civil rights of Michael Watts because of his race, color, ancestry, or national origin. (Pen. Code, §§ 417, subd. (a)(2), 422.7. 1 ) The jury also found him guilty of brandishing a firearm (§ 417, subd. (a)(2)), battery upon a peace officer performing his duties (§§ 242, 243, subd. (b)), resisting an executive officer (§ 69), and falsely identifying himself to a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. State v. ApprendiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API