Legal Opinion

93 Prince Street Corp. v. Wolf

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFelix C. Benvenga, J.

Plaintiff moves for dismissal of the second and third defenses for insufficiency.

The action is upon a lease and an alleged breach thereof, in s that defendant tenant left the premises in a condition constituting a violation of the lease covenant, thus entitling plaintiff to compensation for the injury. The second defense is based upon payment by and release to the mover, not a party to the action. Plaintiff contends that a claim in contract cannot be barred by a release given to a third party upon a claim in negligence. The injuries, for which compensation is sought, are set out in paragraphs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Appleton v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Gray v. FogartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Appleton v. MarxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Pretzfelder v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oliver Cromwell Owners, Inc. v. BengualidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API