Legal Opinion

Pretzfelder v. Kahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed, and judgment is directed to be entered herein in favor of the defendant, with costs. It is obvious that the plaintiff has suffered only a single injury. She is not entitled to double satisfaction. Where the plaintiff has already been recompensed in her negligence action against the active wrongdoer and executed a general release, the niceties of legal theory may not be employed to support a second recovery in contract for the same injury as against the defendant in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Dahlstrom v. . GemunderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Rector of St. James Church v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Gavin v. Malherbe, SchasnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Dry Cleaning Machinery Co. v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. 93 Prince Street Corp. v. WolfNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wellander v. Brooklyn HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API