Babcock v. Farwell
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill in chancery. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Duput, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom
The errors assigned are encompassed within one ruling—the sustaining of the several demurrers and the dismissing of the bill as amended for want of equity. This one ruling, however, demands a searching of the whole pleading, in order that we may determine whether such ruling is erroneous or not. This demand has been fully met with painstaking care. The extensive briefs of the several counsel have received like scrutiny and consideration.
The bill as amended is unusual from the fact that it sets out very largely the evidential facts relied upon as justifying the granting of the relief sought…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Flynn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Duncan v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
- Federal Insurance v. ParelloDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Carlock v. La Salle Extension UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- McLeish v. HansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.