Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
This record requires us to determine whether the court below rightly; refused to enforce an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, by which it was found that an alleged terminal charge, made by the defendants in error, for the delivery of live stock to the stock yards in Chicago, ivas unjust and un*321reasonable, and hence violative of the act to regulate commerce. To avoid the confusion which must be engendered by considering a number of irrelevant issues and to reach.the single question to which the controversy is reducible, it is essential to state the facts, which are uncontroverted,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BehlmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
3Cited by11 opinions
- Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. StickneySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Commerce Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Inter. Com. Commis'n v. CHICAGO & C. R'D CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.