Legal Opinion

Dozier v. Shapiro

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 2011No. B224316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1512Opinion

CHANEY, J.

Plaintiff Robert Dozier appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants Michael R. Shapiro, M.D., and Michael R. Shapiro, M.D., Inc. (collectively Dr. Shapiro), in his action against them for medical malpractice. Plaintiff contends that the trial court committed reversible error by precluding his expert from testifying at trial that Dr. Shapiro’s treatment of Dozier fell below the standard of care, resulting in the dismissal of the action due to Dozier’s inability to prove the elements of his claim. We conclude that the trial court committed no prejudicial error.

Factual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kennemur v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Bonds v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schreiber v. Estate of KiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation v. Edmund A. Gray Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Jones v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ochoa v. DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Belfiore-Braman v. Rotenberg, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. (PC) Witkin v. LotersztainDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Belfiore-Braman v. RotenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Valencia v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API