Chin Hoy v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
Epitomized Opinion
Hoy and Lund were arrested upon a warrant issued under authority of Sec. 19 of the Immigration Act of Feb. 5, 1917. On a full hearing, the Assistant Secretary of Labor found that they were Chinese laborers, not in possession of certificates of residence, who had entered the U. S. in violation of the Chinese exclusion laws, and were subject to deportation. To prevent the execution of the deportation warrant, Hoy and Lund made separate applications to the District Court of Cleveland for writs of habeas corpus. The case was heard upon the pleadings and the departmental record.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jung See v. NashCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Espino v. WixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Lew Shee v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Ex parte GrosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Lund v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.