Legal Opinion
Jung See v. Nash
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1925No. 6656PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
This is an appeal from an order discharging a writ of habeas corpus. •
Jung See, hereinafter called appellant, filed in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the East- ' ern District of Missouri his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, wherein he alleged: That he was unlawfully deprived of his liberty in the city of St. Louis, Mo., by James T. H. Nash, inspector in charge of the United States Immigration Service, and B. E. Barnes, immigrant inspector, under warrants of arrest and deportation. He further alleged therein that such warrants…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charley Hee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
- Ex Parte JurgansDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
- Tom Ung Chai v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Ah Lin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
- Gambroulis v. NashCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.