Legal Opinion

Cabot v. Cabot

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 23, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Both parties have appealed from the pecuniary components of a divorce judgment. Each of the partners to the marriage, which lasted twelve years, came from privileged circumstances and brought to the marriage significant inherited wealth.

*9041. No error attended exclusion by the probate judge of an actuary’s opinion of the present value of the earning capacity of the husband and wife, respectively, until each reached the age of sixty-five. The wife offered that evidence so that the judge, in making an equitable division of property under G. L. c. 208, § 34, might consider the present value of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rice v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Marriage of GrahamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of AufmuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drapek v. DrapekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Wolfe v. WolfeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Cabot v. CabotMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Letteri v. LetteriMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  5. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API