Putnam v. Putnam
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
On March 14, 1975, a probate judge (first judge) entered a decree nisi of divorce for the libellant (husband) on the ground of cruel and abusive treatment. The divorce is -not at issue; the decree has since become absolute. G. L. c. 208, § 21 (as amended through St. 1934, c. 181, § 1). Scholz v. Scholz, 367 Mass. 143 (1975). See now Mass.R.Dom.Rel.P. 62(g) (1975). The decree nisi made no provision for support or property division in lieu thereof, but expressly “reserved” those matters “for future determination.” On March 26, 1975, another probate judge (second judge) ordered the insertion of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Coe v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Bianco v. BiancoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Graves v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Topor v. ToporMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Rice v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Grubert v. GrubertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Redding v. ReddingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.