Legal Opinion

Peter v. Secretary of State

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 15, 1972No. Civ. A. 927-72PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHEY, District Judge:

This case is before us as a result of an action for mandamus, declaratory and injunctive relief. At the request of the plaintiff, a three-judge Court was convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2282 and 2284 (1970), to hear plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of an Act of Congress, namely, section 349(a)(4)(A) of the Expatriation Act of 1954, 8 U.S. C. § 1481(a)(4)(A) (1970). Plaintiff also prays for such other relief as may be appropriate under the circumstances of this case and particularly for an order striking the certificate of loss of plaintiff’s American…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Laurence J. Terrazas v. Cyrus Vance, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. William L. Matheson, of the Will of Dorothy Gould Burns, Deceased, William L. Matheson, of the Will of Dorothy Gould Burns, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API