Legal Opinion

McGraw-Edison Co. v. Trinidad Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment entered January 15, 1969, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent-appellant. Trial Term, after a complete and adequate trial, awarded judgment to the defendant on its counterclaim. No error other that the conclusion reached is asserted. The issue presented was what caused the breakdown of the engines of defendant’s ship, the S.S. Austin. After hearing the testimony the trial court concluded that the failure was rightfully to be attributed to plaintiff’s failure to make the indicated repair to a pole piece. Even though this was a relatively minor item in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. M. S. FaridaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. M. S. Farida, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. And Norton Line, Third-Party Stockholms Rederi-Aktielbolag Svea, Third-Party v. Court Carpentry & Marine Contractors Co., and International Terminal Operating Co., Third-Party AndCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API