Legal Opinion

V.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 2011No. 1D11-2621PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant correctly asserts, and the state properly concedes, the trial court erred in ordering restitution based upon hearsay evidence that was improperly ad*364mitted at the restitution hearing over appellant’s objection. Butler v. State, 970 So.2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Forlano v. State, 964 So.2d 246 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); I.M. v. State, 958 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Herrington v. State, 828 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s restitution determination and remand for a new restitution hearing. Forlano, 964 So.2d at 246; Herrington, 823 So.2d at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creola Land Dev., Inc. v. Bentbrooke Housing, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. I.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Forlano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. VB v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API