Legal Opinion

Nelson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 2012No. 1D11-2128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence for grand theft without discussion. However, appellant correctly asserts, and the state properly concedes, the trial court erred in ordering restitution based on speculation, non-admitted business records, and hearsay evidence admitted at the restitution hearing over appellant’s objection. See V.B. v. State, 75 So.3d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Dreyer v. State, 46 So.3d 613, 615 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Ritch v. State, 14 So.3d 1104, 1107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Butler v. State, 970 So.2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Forlano v. State, 964 So.2d 246 (Fla. 1st DCA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. I.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Forlano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Herrington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Ritch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnny R. Williams v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API