Legal Opinion
Kirk v. Oklahoma
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 23, 1969No. Misc. No. 22PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The above Petitioner has mailed to this Court for filing in forma pauperis, a Petition for Habeas Corpus. The Petitioner is a prisoner confined by and in the State of Texas. The relief sought by the Petition is that he be discharged from a detainer placed on him as a Texas prisoner by the State of Oklahoma by dismissing the Oklahoma criminal charge on which the detainer is based.
This Court is without jurisdiction to dismiss the Oklahoma criminal case. The forum to which the Petitioner should make his request is the Oklahoma Court involved. Vaughn v. State of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Charles Blair v. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Naugle v. FreemanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- James R. Durham, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- David Homer Tidmore v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973