Legal Opinion

East Canyon Land & Stock Co. v. Davis & Weber Counties Canal Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1925No. 4235Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Respondent Davis & Weber Counties Canal Company has filed an application for rehearing. The argument in support of the application for rehearing merely goes over the same ground covered in the original brief and argumefit. We have discovered no reason for changing the original opinion.

It is, however, urged that the rule or measure of damages stated in the opinion is ambiguous. Had counsel taken the pains to examine the authorities to which reference is made in Van Cott v. Jacklin, 63 Utah, 412, 226 P. 460, to which reference is made in the opinion, they would have…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BlackMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Mischke v. BaughnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Penney v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Cott v. JacklinUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Eaton v. LymanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API