Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 31, 1966No. 41193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, Lula Armstrong and Mary Nickerson, were plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred to herein as plaintiffs. Defendant in error, Jaroy Anderson, was the defendant in the trial court and will be referred to herein as the defendant.

Plaintiffs’ petition alleged that the plaintiff Lula Armstrong is past 79 years of age, and the plaintiff Mary Nickerson is past 77 years of age, and they are now being nursed and cared for in a rest home in Oklahoma City; that the defendant is a nephew of the plaintiffs and has had considerable business experience; that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Miller v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Antle v. HartmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Tate v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Owens v. MusselmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Lester v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SmootSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API