Legal Opinion

Penner v. . Elliott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1945PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Slander, as that term is appropriated to oral defamatory utterances as distinguished from libel, may be actionable per se or only per quod. That is, the false remarks in themselves may form the basis of an action for damages, in which case both malice and damage are, as a matter of law, presumed; or the false utterance may be such as to sustain an action only when causing some special damage, in which case both the malice and the special damage must be alleged and proved.

The policy of the law has much restricted the range of defamatory utterances which are actionable per se. Some statutes,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ringgold v. . LandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Donovan v. FiumaraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Canady v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API