Legal Opinion

Stuckley v. Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2013PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

We granted allowance of appeal to determine whether the repeal of an ordinance moots any challenges to that ordinance, whether the Commonwealth Court may issue an opinion on the merits of certain issues where it subsequently remands the case for a determination of mootness on another issue, and whether parties to a hearing can continue a challenge to a zoning ordinance once the original challenger has withdrawn.

Because “parties to a hearing” are distinct from “party appellants,” unless the former have taken steps to become party appellants, we find they cannot continue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilkes-Barre AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. COM. DEPT. OF ENV. RES. v. JubelirerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Kraus v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Frank v. Zoning Hearing Board & Mobile Oil Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. California Borough v. A.G. RotheyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Pendle Hill v. The ZHB of Nether Providence Twp. Appeal of: W. Brophy and E. BrophyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. In Re 2014 Allegheny County Investigating Grand JurySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Adoption of K.M.G., Appeal of: T.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Adoption of K.M.G., Appeal of: T.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API