Hammad v. Saul
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAED HAMMAD, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-568 Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) (ARBUCKLE, M.J.) KILOLO KIJAKAZI1 ) Defendant ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Saed Hammad (“Plaintiff”), an adult individual who resides within the Middle District of Pennsylvania, seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g). This matter is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.