Legal Opinion

Orinoco Realty Co. v. Bandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Maurice Bandler, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of February, 1921, granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings consisting of a complaint and answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Greenbaum, J.:

The complaint alleges that on March 26, 1920, the defendant entered into an agreement of lease with the plaintiff in the terms of renewal of a lease under which defendant was then in possession of an apartment at 1155 Park avenue, New York city, for a three-year term commencing October 1, 1920, at an annual rental of $5,750 and that the rent for the first three months of this term and electric charges had not been paid by the defendant, amounting to $1,461.45, for which sum judgment is asked.

The answer, after alleging certain denials which are unimportant here, sets up as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edgar A. Levy Leasing Company, Inc. v. . SiegelNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Sylvan Mortgage Co. v. StadlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
  3. Paterno Investing Corp. v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Paterno Investing Corp. v. KatzNew York Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuperschmid v. Globe Brief Case Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
  2. Stayton Realty Corp. v. RhodesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Kuperschmid v. Globe Brief Case Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API