Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Middlekamp
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s amended bill of complaint challenges the validity of the Franchise Tax Law enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Missouri. Session Laws 1917, p. 237.
In the case of St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Co. v. George H. Middlekamp, State Treasurer, et al., this court, the present judges sitting, considered numerous objections presented by the plaintiff in that case, and sustained the law.1
One of the points urged was that the law is void, because in conflict with the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Missouri, which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Southern Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Sams v. St. Louis & Meramec River RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. WestbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stamper Black Hills Gold Jewelry, Inc. v. SoutherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Champlin Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Toy Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1930
- (PS) Bynum v. County of Siskiyou Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Anna Pakhomova v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.