Legal Opinion
Hiatt v. Miller Bank
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
On the 5th day of February, 1929, the plaintiff filed her claim for a preference with the commissioner of finance, in charge of the liquidation of Miller Bank of Miller, Missouri. There is no complaint as to the form of the claim or pleadings in this case, therefore we do not set the pleadings out in full, but the plaintiff’s claim sets out her theory of the case, and that part which is material here is as follows:
“Mattie Hiatt, of lawful age, being duly sworn, off her oath states that there was due her from the Miller Bank, Miller, Missouri, the sum of four hundred and twenty-five dollars,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of Poplar Bluff v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Midland National Bank of Kansas City v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Johnson v. Farmers BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
- S. S. Allen Grocery Co. v. Bank of Buchanan CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- Nichols v. Bank of SyracuseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Converse Rubber Co. v. Boston-Continental Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
- Farmers Bank of Deepwater v. MoberlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
- Seaborn v. Reno Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1937
- Akron Coal Co. v. Fulton, Supt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Kahmann v. MoberlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.