Legal Opinion

Matter of Joseph M.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1993PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

The general rule established by CPL 160.50 is that — unless the court determines that the interests of justice require otherwise — the record of a criminal action or proceeding upon termination in favor of the accused "shall be sealed and not made available to any person or public or private agency” (subd [1] [c]). The statute specifies that the sealed records shall be made available upon request to the accused and to six enumerated categories of persons or public or private agencies (see, subd [1] [d]). The question presented in this appeal is whether a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hynes v. KarassikNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In re of DondiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  5. MATTER OF SKYLINE INN CORP. v. New York State Liquor Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Obabueki v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Mtr of Katherine B v. CataldoNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. First American Corp. v. Al-NahyanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. Lino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API