Legal Opinion

Great Western Bank & Trust v. Nahat

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 11, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5867, 1 CA-CIV 5919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEIN SCHMIDT, Judge.

This case involves a question of whether the payee of a dishonored check, or instead the bank which was negligent in its attempt to collect the check, should bear the loss of the check’s dishonor. A $10,000 check dated November 6, 1978, was drawn by a Frank Ross payable to appellee Leon Nahat. Nahat testified that after receiving the check Ross requested that he wait a few days before negotiating it so that “it would be more comfortable for him [Ross].” He also testified that Ross never actually informed him that the check would not clear but admitted that he knew…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. De SantisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  2. Brannon v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Ratner v. Central Nat. Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. First National Bank v. NunnMontana Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Azalea City Motels, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Donovan v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
  3. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API