State v. Russell
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Charles Russell appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possessing drug paraphernalia. Russell argues the district court erred when it granted the State’s motion in li-mine preventing him from cross-examining the arresting officer about a pending criminal charge, and evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Russell possessed drug paraphernalia. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Russell was a passenger in a car stopped by Corporal Travis Bateman of the McKenzie County Sheriffs Office. Bateman testified he stopped the car because it was in a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. DemaraisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020