Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2016No. 20160065PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Charles Russell appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possessing drug paraphernalia. Russell argues the district court erred when it granted the State’s motion in li-mine preventing him from cross-examining the arresting officer about a pending criminal charge, and evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Russell possessed drug paraphernalia. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Russell was a passenger in a car stopped by Corporal Travis Bateman of the McKenzie County Sheriffs Office. Bateman testified he stopped the car because it was in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. DemaraisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API