Clark v. Goldman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.. The plaintiff’s attorneys in two representative creditors’ actions appeal from a joint order made in both actions denying them any additional allowance for their services, The actions were begun on August 18, 1933, at the suggestion and request of the New York Superintendent of Insurance ;- the defendants consented to judgment and receivers were appointed on the same day and qualified at once. They resigned during the long course of the litigation and others were substituted; all have been either assistants of the Superintendent, or have -acted in harmony with him.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Eureka Upholstering Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- In Re Porto Rican American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- In Re Consolidated Motor Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Davis v. Seneca Falls Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Warren v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- United States v. American Society Of Composers, Authors And PublishersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. American Society of ComposersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Lewis v. NavinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946