Garner v. State

Several insistencies of error are presented upon this appeal. Error was committed by the court in allowing the State to prove over the timely objection of the defendant, that one Barney Baulk had been indicted for living in adultery with the sister of Ola Belle Sasser, also in allowing the solicitor to inquire of its witness Jodie' Sasser, “Do you-know what became of his case?” and in declining to exclude the answer of the witness, who replied, “They married.” And the further question, “After they were indicted?”' Answer: “Tes, sir.” This line of inquiry was wholly irrelevant to any issue ■…