Morrow v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
A cross-examination that tends to show interest or bias of a witness is “relevant to the issue.” Ex parte State (Johnson v. State) 199 Ala. 255, 74 South. 366; Whitsett v. Belue, 172 Ala. 256, 265, 54 South. 677; Houston Biscuit Co. v. Dial, 135 Ala. 168, 185, 33 South. 268; A. G. S. R. Co. v. Johnston, 128 Ala. 283, 295, 29 South. 771; Burger v. State, 83 Ala. 36, 3 South. 319; Underhill on Criminal Ev. § 222; 1 Greenl. on Ev. (15th Ed.) § 448 et seq.; 3 Ency. of Ev. 849 ; 2 Ency. of Ev. 407 ; 5 Jones on Ev. §§ 828, 901.
There was prejudicial error in the undue limiting of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Whitsett v. BelueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Burger v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Houston Biscuit Co. v. DialSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.