Barkley v. Pool
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe district court for Lancaster county: William M. Morning, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
Tbe controversy in this case is over tbe taxation of costs. In January, 1919, tbe district court rendered a decree “that tbe costs of this action shall be paid, one-half'by tbe secretary of state, and one-balf by tbe interveners herein, and plaintiffs are hereby given judgment against said defendant and interveners for costs of this action.”
An appeal was taken on the merits of the case, and on January 28, Í919, tbe decree was affirmed by this court. On October 11, 1919, a motion, accompanied by affidavits, was filed in tbe district court “for an order directing the clerk of tbe district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Big Goose & Beaver Ditch Co. v. MorrowWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
- Fisher v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Fairbairn v. DanaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Smith v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Frankel v. Chicago, Burlington & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Solomon v. A. W. Farney, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Allen v. TallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Muff v. Mahloch Farms Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1970
- Wirtele v. Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United WorkmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.