Squire v. Guardian Trust Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentTurner, J.
We dissent for two reasons: In the first place we are of the opinion that the cases present final orders affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding and, therefore, under the previous decisions of this court, are reviewable by the Court of Appeals.
In the second place we see no reason for failing t6follow the practice in earlier cases.
To discuss these reasons in inverse order: In the only cases where orders respecting revivorship have come to this court they have been disposed of as final orders made in special proceedings.
In the statement of facts in the case of Carter v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Havill v. HavillIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Porter, Exr. v. LerchOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Voss v. StollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- William Watson & Co. v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court · 1855
- Levin v. MuserNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.