Legal Opinion

Briscoe v. Hydro Conduit Corporation

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1975No. 2072PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Plaintiff filed an action pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Sections 59-10-1 through 59-10-37, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 9, 1974, pt. 1)) alleging total disability and seeking a lump sum award pursuant to § 59-10-18.2, supra.

Plaintiff’s affidavit admitted the $75.00 weekly payment and the following sworn statements were set forth :

“That defendants have failed to make payment of a bill in the amount of $50.-00 for diagnostic studies made of the plaintiff at the direction of Dr. Chester, one of the physicians to whom plaintiff has been referred by defendants.
“Th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schiller v. Southwest Air Rangers, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Nasci v. Frank Paxton Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kosmicki Ex Rel. Barnes v. Aspen Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rayburn v. Boys Super Market, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lamont v. New Mexico Military InstituteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Romero v. S. S. Kresge Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Brewster v. Cooley & AssociatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Bower v. Western Fleet MaintenanceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Hort v. General Electric Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API