Briscoe v. Hydro Conduit Corporation
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff filed an action pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Sections 59-10-1 through 59-10-37, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 9, 1974, pt. 1)) alleging total disability and seeking a lump sum award pursuant to § 59-10-18.2, supra.
Plaintiff’s affidavit admitted the $75.00 weekly payment and the following sworn statements were set forth :
“That defendants have failed to make payment of a bill in the amount of $50.-00 for diagnostic studies made of the plaintiff at the direction of Dr. Chester, one of the physicians to whom plaintiff has been referred by defendants.
“Th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schiller v. Southwest Air Rangers, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Nasci v. Frank Paxton Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Kosmicki Ex Rel. Barnes v. Aspen Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Rayburn v. Boys Super Market, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lamont v. New Mexico Military InstituteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Romero v. S. S. Kresge Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Brewster v. Cooley & AssociatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bower v. Western Fleet MaintenanceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hort v. General Electric Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.