Legal Opinion
David W. Piel, Deceased, by Tillie Margaret Piel v. Eugene H. Falkner
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 28, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8273PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, awarding priority in Interference No. 95,198 to Eugene H. Falkner, appellee and junior party.
The single count of the interference corresponds to claim 2 of appellant Piel’s patent 1 which was copied and added to Falkner’s application 2 by amendment. The invention of the count relates to a closure for a freeze or expansion plug in the block of an internal combustion engine. Since it is not pertinent to the issues here, it will not be further described.
The issue here is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mims v. Central Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Land v. DreyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Edwin H. Land and Meroe M. Morse v. Francis A. Regan, Jr., Seamon A. Lincoln and Donald E. HansonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Kilian v. Stackpole Sons, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Goodbar v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1971
- Morris v. DiamondCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980