Legal Opinion

Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 26, 2008No. Civil Action 07-201 (RMC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff Lacy Davis, III, is a federal inmate who brought this suit against the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), 1 alleging that he should be placed in BOP’s drug abuse treatment program and that upon completion of the program, he should be considered for a reduced sentence. He contends that BOP’s denial of his request to be placed in the program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701. On October 23, 2007, the Court dismissed his suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rice v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Ayash v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API