Legal Opinion
New York Edison Co. v. Maltbie
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
The petitioners, other than the Westchester Lighting Company, are engaged in the distribution of electricity within *201the city of New York, the system companies, so called, having approximately 2,000,000 consumers. The petitioner Westchester Lighting Company distributes electricity to a relatively small number of consumers within the city of New York, and also operates in Westchester county.
This is a motion for a stay and suspension of the operation of the orders of the Public Service Commission, requiring petitioners to put into effect as temporary rates new or amended tariff schedules pending…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- People Ex Rel. Municipal Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- In re Upstate Telephone Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Queens Borough Gas & Electric Co. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- In re Long Island Lighting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- New Rochelle Water Co. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.