Legal Opinion

Double Eagle Alloys, Inc. v. Hooper

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 2024No. 4:19-cv-00243Unknown

1Opinion

Qnuited States District Court for the S2Qorthern District of Oklahoma Case No. 19-cv-243-JDR-CDL DOUBLE EAGLE ALLOYS, INC., Plaintiff, versus MICHAEL Hooper; AcE ALLoys, LLC, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Following the entry of an order granting summary judgment in their favor, Defendants Ace Alloys, LLC and Michael Hooper filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro- cedure. Dkt. 346. Defendants argue that, as the prevailing parties in this case, they are entitled to recover the attorneys’ fees they incurred in defense of Double Eagle’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Freecom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Sterling Energy, Ltd., D/B/A Senco, a Texas Corporation v. Friendly National Bank, an Oklahoma Banking Corporation and George W. Higgins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. API Americas Inc. v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API