Legal Opinion

United States v. Di Genova

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 24, 1943No. 8216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant was tried in the district court for a violation of the provisions of Revised Statutes § 5209, as amended, 12 U.S.C.A. § 592. That statute provides, insofar as herein pertinent, that: “Any officer, director, agent, or employee of any * * * insured bank * * * who embezzles * * * any of the moneys, funds, or credits of such * * * insured bank, or * * * who makes any false entry in any book, report, or statement of such * * * insured bank, with intent in any case to injure or defraud such * * * insured bank * * * or to deceive any officer of such * * * insured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. France v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Mickle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Duff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. NazarokDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Harris v. Gov't of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API