United States v. Nazarok
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Dennis M. Nazarok was found guilty-after trial by jury on a four count indictment charging him with bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (b), and (d). Before me is Nazarok’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to sustain conviction. In the alternative, the motion seeks a new trial on the ground that the jury’s verdict is against the weight of the evidence and that the court erred in its charge to the jury.
1. Motion for Judgment of Acquittal.
The substance of the government’s evidence was:…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CichySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. PenaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WimberlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Commonwealth v. DolanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. CichySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.