Legal Opinion

Choice v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1919No. 1487PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County ; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Action by Mrs. M. P. Choice against the City of Hollas and A. E. Firmin and wife, with cross-bill by defendant Firmin and wife. General- and special exceptions urged by defendant City to plaintiff’s petition and to the cross-bill sustained, and plaintiff and Firmin and wife appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

This suit was brought by appellant Mrs. M. B. Choice against the City of Dallas to recover a reward offered by the city “for the arrest and conviction of any one guilty of arson within the corporate limits of the city of Dallas.” A. E. Firmin and wife, Mrs. Nellie Firman, were made defendants on allegations that they were claiming the reward. These parties appeared, and by cross-bill sought to recover the reward. The court sustained general and special exceptions urged by the city to the plaintiff’s petition and the cross-bill of Mrs. Firmin, and this appeal complains of this action.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Brenham v. Brenham Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. City of Winchester v. RedmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. Noel v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Crofut v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  5. Kinn v. First National Bank of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zachry v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Neal v. Boog-ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. EnasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1989
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API