Legal Opinion

Britson v. Tjernagel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Story District Court. — Hon. S. M. Weaver, Judge. Action at law to recover the sum of two hundred ■dollars which plaintiff alleged he deposited with the defendant hank. The defendants denied that the alleged deposit was made. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

I. The Citizens’ Bank, defendant, is located at Story City, and is owned by the defendants Tjernagel and Swan. In 1891 the plaintiff was •engaged in the hardware business at a village named Roland, a few miles from Story City, and he did his banking business with said bank. He claims that he delivered to the defendant Tjernagel the sum of two hundred dollars in currency, at Roland, to be deposited in the bank, and that he received no credit for said money. There is no question made as to the sufficiency •of the evidence to authorize a verdict for plaintiff.

II. When the plaintiff commenced the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rayburn v. Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Hall v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Fowler v. Town of Strawberry HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ames v. ChirurgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. New Sharon Creamery Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Hildenbrand v. StinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Thielen v. SchechingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API