Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rabold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 2008No. 106 MAP 2007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

Appeal was allowed to consider a challenge to a jury instruction explaining the verdict of guilty but mentally ill.

By way of essential background, a verdict of guilty but mentally ill is authorized by Section 314 of the Crimes Code, as follows:(a) General rule. — A person who timely offers a defense of insanity in accordance with the Rules of Criminal Procedure may be found “guilty but mentally ill” at trial if the trier of facts finds, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person is guilty of an offense, was mentally ill at the time of the commission of the offense and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YasipourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. AndreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Com. v. Fortune, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Watson, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API