Commonwealth v. Rabold
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
Appeal was allowed to consider a challenge to a jury instruction explaining the verdict of guilty but mentally ill.
By way of essential background, a verdict of guilty but mentally ill is authorized by Section 314 of the Crimes Code, as follows:(a) General rule. — A person who timely offers a defense of insanity in accordance with the Rules of Criminal Procedure may be found “guilty but mentally ill” at trial if the trier of facts finds, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person is guilty of an offense, was mentally ill at the time of the commission of the offense and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YasipourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. AndreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Com. v. Fortune, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Watson, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.