Legal Opinion

Bourguignon v. Guinta

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 24, 2003No. 3:01CV1151(SRU)(WIG)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNDERHILL, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Bristout Bourguignon (“Bourguignon”), brings this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. He alleges that he was falsely arrested and imprisoned by the defendants in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. In addition, he asserts state law claims of defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Pending are the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and Bourguig-non’s motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ motion is granted and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Witt v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022