Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Goldsmith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Oceana./ (Russell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

Goldsmith brought into the circuit *251court for the county of Oceana a justice’s judgment, which-was affirmed. He brings error on the affirmance.

The suit was commenced by attachment, which seems to have been regular, but not personally served. On the return-day plaintiff appeared by attorney, and, defendant not appearing, the case was adjourned for 30 days. In the meantime a motion was made before a circuit court commissioner to dissolve the attachment under the statute, and he made an order dissolving it, from which Churchill appealed. Pending this appeal, the case came on at the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hay v. City of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Krolik v. LangMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hahn v. SeifertMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API