Legal Opinion

Krolik v. Lang

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Lapeer; Smith, J. Case by Henry A. Krolik and-others, a copartnership, doing business under the firm name of A. Krolik & Company, against John W. Lang for fraud and deceit. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action in tort, filing a declaration in a plea of trespass on the case charging defendant with fraud in obtaining goods on credit from them by means of a false financial statement, setting out and particularly charging, as the fraudulent act on which credit for the indebtedness sought to be recovered was obtained, a statement of his financial condition made to and for them on February 18, 1910. At the time this indebtedness accrued, and for some years previous, defendant owfied and operated a general store in Dryden, Lapeer county, Mich., and purchased merchandise of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferris v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stauffer v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  3. Ross v. MinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Freedman v. CampfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Churchill v. GoldsmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Columbus Pipe & Equipment Co. v. SefanskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ver Wys v. Vander MeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. International Shoe Co. Inc. v. BerickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API